<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Content Network Is A Hotbed Of Click Fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://payperclickjournal.com/googles-content-network/02/10/2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://payperclickjournal.com/googles-content-network/02/10/2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://payperclickjournal.com/googles-content-network/02/10/2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2058</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://payperclickjournal.com/?p=1195#comment-2058</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention.  You&#039;re right - if you&#039;re going to use the Content Network (and I still highly recommend that you do), you have to be smart.  Utilize negative sites, run placement performance reports, etc., etc.  

Bad things can happen, but if you&#039;re proactive - they&#039;re much less likely to!

- John, PPCHero.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention.  You&#8217;re right &#8211; if you&#8217;re going to use the Content Network (and I still highly recommend that you do), you have to be smart.  Utilize negative sites, run placement performance reports, etc., etc.  </p>
<p>Bad things can happen, but if you&#8217;re proactive &#8211; they&#8217;re much less likely to!</p>
<p>- John, PPCHero.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

