Comments on: SEMCompare: Trouble or Savior? http://payperclickjournal.com/sem-compare/03/29/2008/ Pay Per Click and PPC Advertising Blog Tue, 05 May 2009 12:22:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: David Temple http://payperclickjournal.com/sem-compare/03/29/2008/comment-page-1/#comment-351 David Temple Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:10:57 +0000 http://payperclickjournal.com/semcompare-trouble-or-savior/03/29/2008/#comment-351 I guess they've agreed to eliminate anyonymous reviews but not for those that already wrote one. I guess they’ve agreed to eliminate anyonymous reviews but not for those that already wrote one.

]]> By: Brick Marketing http://payperclickjournal.com/sem-compare/03/29/2008/comment-page-1/#comment-347 Brick Marketing Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:59:11 +0000 http://payperclickjournal.com/semcompare-trouble-or-savior/03/29/2008/#comment-347 Kalena, thanks for the links. You can see the response at <a href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2008/03/30/rrreoww-theres-a-cat-fight-over-seo-standards/" rel="nofollow">SEOJ</a>. David, negative reviews can be a problem, but the ones that I saw and that Kalena pointed out weren't not really that bad. Every company, after being in business awhile, will get a few negative reviews. No one can help everyone. The problem is that anonymous reviews aren't really helpful because I can't test the credibility of the reviewer. There should be transparency both ways, not just one way. Kalena, thanks for the links. You can see the response at SEOJ.

David, negative reviews can be a problem, but the ones that I saw and that Kalena pointed out weren’t not really that bad. Every company, after being in business awhile, will get a few negative reviews. No one can help everyone. The problem is that anonymous reviews aren’t really helpful because I can’t test the credibility of the reviewer. There should be transparency both ways, not just one way.

]]> By: David Temple http://payperclickjournal.com/sem-compare/03/29/2008/comment-page-1/#comment-346 David Temple Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:57:09 +0000 http://payperclickjournal.com/semcompare-trouble-or-savior/03/29/2008/#comment-346 I'm curious why you don't think the negative reviews are problems? If someone wrote any of those about my company I'd have major problems, I think your idea of reviewer ratings is bood but wouldn't work in this case as how many companies has a reviewer used. With Amanzon a person can read and review hundreds of books. I’m curious why you don’t think the negative reviews are problems? If someone wrote any of those about my company I’d have major problems, I think your idea of reviewer ratings is bood but wouldn’t work in this case as how many companies has a reviewer used. With Amanzon a person can read and review hundreds of books.

]]> By: Kalena http://payperclickjournal.com/sem-compare/03/29/2008/comment-page-1/#comment-345 Kalena Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:45:32 +0000 http://payperclickjournal.com/semcompare-trouble-or-savior/03/29/2008/#comment-345 Hi Nick - nice to see you chiming in here and thanks for the link. It's a hairy issue and is kind of related to the Sphinn discussions going on right now re standards: http://sphinn.com/story/37119 and http://sphinn.com/story/37287 Hi Nick – nice to see you chiming in here and thanks for the link. It’s a hairy issue and is kind of related to the Sphinn discussions going on right now re standards: http://sphinn.com/story/37119 and http://sphinn.com/story/37287

]]>